[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 

  
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

****

Cinema Releases - November 16, 2001

Rated on a 4-star scale. Certificate PG. 152 minutes. Directed by Chris Columbus. Written by Steven Kloves; from the novel by J.K. Rowling. Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Richard Harris, Ian Hart, John Cleese, Zoe Wanamaker, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Tom Felton.


I have one complaint of "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone", which is that the final showdown is a little too short, and therefore anticlimactic. With that observation out of the way, I am free to tell you that the movie is a wondrous achievement whose life, wit and vision made me grin from start to finish. In between the smiling I actually found myself gazing, gasping and laughing out loud.

The film is, of course, based on the first in a series of J.K. Rowling bestsellers about Harry, the 11-year old boy-wizard from Surrey who finds himself whisked away to Hogwarts' School of Witchcraft and Wizardry to learn potion-making, get up to mischief in an invisibility cloak, play a supernatural sport called Quidditch while mounted on a broomstick and foil an evil plot to steal the Philosopher's Stone, which will produce gold and everlasting life.

The books are so well-loved that the filmmakers sure had high expectations to meet. I've read "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone", and can report that the movie stays true to the letter of the text and surpasses it in spirit. So many things could have gone wrong -- the special effects could have looked cheesy, the kids in the cast could have been embarrassing, the corporate nitwits at Warner Bros could have watered down the material in a clumsy attempt to make it appeal to as many people as possible. But no. This is a masterpiece.

Daniel Radcliffe, who plays Harry, has charm and depth about him, and the proper look of a landmark hero. Rupert Grint plays his best friend, Ron Weasley, and Emma Watson is Hermione Granger, their grounding influence. The three main kids in the movie are both gorgeous and talented, and, as with all the child actors in "Philosopher's Stone", they have animation of movement and insistence of speech that would seem like childish overacting in another movie, but here, as in "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory", is just the right injection of theatrical energy. This is a story rooted in fantasy and largesse -- the kids here understand that every bit as well as the wonderful adult supporting cast, which is made up of legendary British talent such as Richard Harris, Maggie Smith, John Cleese, Alan Rickman and Robbie Coltrane.

For some reason the technical credits looked cheesy in the teaser trailer; they are, in fact, superb. The production design, photography and visual effects all beam with colour and personality. The original score by John Williams sounds like Tchaikovsky. The movie was directed by Chris Columbus, the man who wrote "Gremlins" but whose credits as a helmsman have included "Stepmom" and "Nine Months" and peaked with "Home Alone" and "Mrs. Doubtfire". I would not have predicted that he could handle a project of this magnitude with this amount of skill, but here we have it.

Watching "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone", I got the same gut feeling as in "Star Wars", "Raiders of the Lost Ark", "The Wizard of Oz" and "Beauty and the Beast" -- that indefinable sensation we get when we know we're watching something hallowed. The book was solid storytelling -- well-structured, sweetly written, with well-chosen old-fashioned imagery. The movie is magic. I am so convinced it will be a classic that I have already begun pondering the drinking game.

COPYRIGHT© 2001 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2001 Reviews (alphabetical)
2001 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page