[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 
 
  
Russell Crowe, "A Beautiful Mind"

  
A Beautiful Mind

***

Cinema Releases - March 1, 2002

Rated on a 4-star scale. Certificate 12. 159 minutes. Directed by Ron Howard. Written by Akiva Golsman; from the book by Sylvia Nasar. Starring Russell Crowe, Ed Harris, Jennifer Connelly, Christopher Plummer, Paul Bettany, Adam Goldberg, Josh Lucas.


John Forbes Nash, Jr was a brilliant mathematician who in 1949 wrote a paper about games theory that eventually became applied in fields as varied as trade, psychology and biology, and won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1994. From the mid-1950s up until 1990, Nash developed schizophrenia, found that it was ruining both his own life and the lives of those around him, and ended up willing himself out of the disease simply by ignoring the things he was told weren't real.

This could not have been an easy task, as hardly anyone in recorded history has managed to achieve it, and I would have appreciated some more detail about the process in "A Beautiful Mind", which is based on the bestselling Sylvia Nasar book about Nash's life and features Russell Crowe in the lead role. The last third of Ron Howard's film, which deals with Nash's recovery, tells a lot of things in montage and skims over the background of life -- I would have preferred the film to run for three hours and give us a little more detail. The real John Nash went through a divorce and a lot of sexual experimentation while he was trying to rid himself of mental illness, suggesting the period was rich in emotional particulars, and I would have liked to see them.

The strength of "A Beautiful Mind" comes in its first two thirds -- I don't want to give anything away, but I will say that there is a bold structural move at one point in this movie that cleverly reveals its portrayal of schizophrenia. We get a sense of the point of view of a schizophrenic -- the movie creeps up on us insidiously, much like the disease, and clicks into focus the 'reality is perception' cliché.

Other clichés are put into context so effectively that they don't feel like clichés, because we've seen them evolve. Paranoid ramblings, conversations with thin air, mood swings, depressive silences, agitated body language and obsessive scribblings -- this is all typical madman behaviour that we've seen in other movies, but here we understand where it comes from.

Ron Howard directs the movie without the bizarre stylistic devices that no doubt tempt all filmmakers who tackle movies about the mind, letting the aforementioned bold structural move speak for itself. The feel of the picture is one of straightforwardly absorbing drama, which is of course crucial to our gut involvement, and gives the twist meaning. Crowe is an involving lead; we know from other movies that his very presence has an indefinable interest about it, and to the role of Nash he brings a memorable West Virginian accent and specific way of communicating, as well as an endearing nerdiness and general goodness. Jennifer Connelly, as Nash's wife Alicia, gives heart to the movie -- with her striking expressions, curious eyes and voice of strained confidence, she combines strength and vulnerability in a manner that is crucial for us to both care about and believe her character's story. I've thought for years that Connelly is a born star -- she's not only a damn good actress, but has a beauty that pours out at us with the vigour and purity of water from a mountain spring -- and now, with the Oscar nomination and publicity that has come from this role, she is finally getting her dues.

"A Beautiful Mind" has problems -- I really wish that last third had been less sketchy, because before it the movie had seemed to be building to greatness. Still, the film does a remarkable job of making us see things the way it wants us to. "Do I look imagined?", someone asks the confused Nash at one point, and well, that's the real question, isn't it? In the skewed perception of schizophrenics, each thing seems as real as every other, but some just might happen to not be true. Which leads me to an unanswerable question -- how do schizophrenics know that the people telling them that they're schizophrenics aren't hallucinations in themselves? Do you think John Nash sometimes wonders if he hallucinated winning the Nobel Prize?

COPYRIGHT© 2002 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2002 Reviews (alphabetical)
2002 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page