[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 
 
  
Michael Moore, "Bowling for Columbine"

  
Bowling for Columbine

****

Cinema Releases - November 29, 2002

Rated on a 4-star scale. Certificate 15. USA. 120 minutes. Directed by Michael Moore. A documentary featuring Michael Moore, George W. Bush, Dick Clark, Charlton Heston, Marilyn Manson, Chris Rock, Matt Stone.


Every now and again I will find a movie powerful enough to make me physically tremble. "Bowling for Columbine" is a movie like that. After seeing it at this year's Telluride Film Festival, I noted that being in the audience was like taking part at a protest rally. When we stood and cheered as the credits rolled, we not only signalled enthusiasm, but thudded our hands together with force as if hoping to make a statement with the aggression of our applause.

The film is a documentary about American gun culture. If that makes it sound boring, consider that it has been made by Michael Moore, the camcorder guerrilla behind "Roger & Me" and "The Awful Truth", who travels with a chip on his shoulder and rips into pet hates with the best kind of offhand humour. In one early scene, he goes into a bank, opens the account that gets you the free rifle, and asks a simple question: "Don't you think it's a little dangerous handing out guns in a bank?"

Sometimes it's not what Moore says, but the way he says it. The guy plods around in scruffy clothes, speaks in a folksy accent, and has a knack for leading people into saying certain things, or commenting on them in a way that makes his reaction obvious to the audience but not to those onscreen. He makes sardonically observant little side comments, sometimes speaks innocent phrases with hidden suggestions, and in general creates the aura of a smart kid in the classroom of a bad teacher, who won't stop cracking wise or following up on inconsistencies until he has made his point.

Moore using humour as a weapon is what we have seen in his previous film and television work, so "Bowling for Columbine" starts as expected. Archive footage is assembled into a rhythm of provocative political satire, while Mike interviews such characters as the brother of Oklahoma bomber Terry Nichols and the members of the Michigan Militia. These guys drift from logic into nonsense with such conviction that the ironies of their own speech end up making their cases look bad without Moore having to say anything.

Moore goes on the road, conducts his discussions, surveys all the conventional theories about why the United States has a higher rate of gun-related crime than any other nation. At one point he goes to Canada, and finds a healthy gun culture in a society where citizens leave their doors unlocked and people just don't go around shooting each other. And then we realise something: Moore has stumbled onto debunking the idea that gun availability is the main cause of gun violence. He doesn't have all the answers this time. He is not shooting footage to back up predetermined theories, but genuinely investigating.

"Bowling for Columbine" becomes thrilling as it keeps asking questions and going off on tangents, delving into the corruption of United States foreign policy, the nature of violence on its home turf, the culture of fear generated by its news reports and politicians. I laughed hard at the film's sarcastic passages, including an animated short tracing the history of white America's paranoia and aggression from the slave trade up until today, and Moore's conversations with everyone from Marilyn Manson to Charlton Heston. We also get the most sombre scenes of Moore's career: On first viewing, tears were suddenly jetting from my eyes, not only because of the material's implications, but from scenes of visceral shock, like when the security tape footage from the Columbine High School massacre came onto the screen and those anguished 911 calls played on the soundtrack.

Certain scenes have come under fire, because Moore is less a journalist than a concerned citizen with the skills of a performer and the determination to keep on truckin'. In one scene he tracks down Dick Clark, so he can ask the former TV personality why his restaurant takes part in a welfare-to-work programme that forces single parents into low-paying jobs. Some critics have alleged that badgering Clark about such matters is unfair attention-seeking, but I don't think so: Clark has the opportunity to answer questions, and he is treated in a respectful manner. It is Clark who has such shoddy engagement in his own business that it ruins people's lives, Clark who chooses not to listen, Clark who makes himself look bad. Moore is not objective, but he is fair.

There is much I have not included, but the job of a movie review is to suggest the power of an experience rather than recount every detail. The point to make is that "Bowling for Columbine" runs at breakneck speed for just over two hours, finding ingeniously entertaining ways of taking us on its many trains of thought. One could make the criticism that its demonstrations of a fearful society are in themselves overwhelmingly frightening, but in a way Moore's material simply argues for common sense: Why does the NRA feel the need to show up at massacre sites, rubbing salt into the wounds? Why has American TV news gotten so sick that it actively attempts to warp society? Why do fat white guys in the West keep on abusing countries of little brown people, and then get surprised when the chickens come home to roost in the form of terrorist attacks?

The questions come across as adolescent on the page, but tangible and urgent on the screen. "Bowling for Columbine" is the right movie at the right time, and if it were seen, it could change America, not only because it is full of necessary discussion points, but because it is so accessible that it makes complex politics understandable to viewers looking for nothing but energetic entertainment. If you believe in the power of movies, making sure this one gets noticed should be considered a duty.

COPYRIGHT© 2002 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2002 Reviews (alphabetical)
2002 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page