[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 
 
  
Ben Affleck as Gavin Banek in "Changing Lanes"

  
Changing Lanes

****

Cinema Releases - November 1, 2002

Rated on a 4-star scale. Certificate 15. USA. 99 minutes. Directed by Roger Michell. Written by Chap Taylor, Michael Tolkin; from a story by Taylor. Starring Ben Affleck, Samuel L. Jackson, Kim Staunton, Amanda Peet, Toni Collette, Sydney Pollack, Tina Sloan, Richard Jenkins, Akil Walker, Cole Hawkins.


The rush of excitement that we get from discovering great movies usually makes them easy to write about. Opinions and emotions tumble from the heart onto the page. Undoubtedly it will all come out as hyperbole, but there is so much I do and do not want to say about "Changing Lanes" that I have been milling around here at a loss on how to start this review. Let's begin with a simple observation: This is one of the best films I have ever seen.

It begins on the road, with two men who have to be in court. Ben Affleck plays Gavin Banek, a successful New York lawyer on his way to file a Power of Appointment. Samuel L. Jackson is Doyle Gipson, a salesman who has to show up at a custody hearing to prevent his ex-wife from taking their two boys to Oregon. There is an accident. Affleck and Jackson get out of their cars to exchange information. They're both in a rush, which clouds Affleck's head enough that he drives off when he can't find his insurance card. Jackson is stranded, and Affleck has accidentally left him with a folder full of crucial documents.

Affleck gets to court slightly late and realises that his files have been left in the other man's possession. Jackson gets there very late and finds that the custody hearing has been held without him, and not turned out in his favour. One man needs the other, and the other is angry at the first man: The stage is set for a day of complex exchanges, one-upmanship and revenge.

Yes, the film has that, but it is much more, as it begins to strip away the layers of its characters. We soon learn, for example, that Affleck is not just a white-collar jerk, but a guy with a history of activism who doesn't recognise his slow turning into the typical Wall Street lawyer. And that Jackson is not just a loving father getting victimised by bad luck, but a man at the mercy of great weaknesses; he's a recovering alcoholic, and part of the reason we see him trying to do everything the right way to get himself out of mess is the fact that he got himself there through his own bad decisions.

The writers, Chap Taylor and Michael Tolkin, and the director, Roger Michell, keep switching back and forth as Affleck and Jackson react to each other. Affleck needs his file so much that he goes to a guy with dodgy computer skills, and switches off Jackson's credit as a means of blackmail. Jackson needed credit for a loan to buy a house for his family; he blows up at the bank, getting himself in hotter water and solidifying his determination to make things difficult for Affleck.

And so on, and so on, developing into a complex plot that at every step involves careful dissection of the implications of actions, the moral choices the characters have to make and how they reveal their histories and personalities. There is high drama from the two leads, as they find themselves in loud passion plays and quiet, sobbing moments of desperation. There is also amazing use of supporting characters: Toni Collette, as Affleck's secretary, and William Hurt, as Jackson's AA partner, provide brief counsels and commentaries, and there are three searing, devastating speeches that rip the characters views and justifications of themselves apart, delivered by Amanda Peet (as Affleck's wife), Kim Staunton (Jackson's wife) and Sydney Pollack (Affleck's boss).

Peet comes on and lays out her married life with chilling ease. She tells Affleck that the law at his level of the game is a big con, suggests that he needs to stop kidding himself with ethical dilemmas and matters of principle, acts as if he and her have chosen the path to hell and might as well enjoy it, and shatters Affleck's idea of himself as a man changing the system from the inside. In hushed tones that act as a disturbing contrast to the flustered appearance of Affleck, she whispers, "I could have chosen to marry an honest man. But I married you, Gav. We're a team."

Staunton delivers her show-stopper late in the film, when one of Jackson's brushes with Affleck has landed him in jail for a few hours. The Jackson performance has been so skilful at making us empathise with the character that we've seen him as a victim of circumstance and the chaos of surroundings; he has raised his voice and shown boiling rage in his eyes, but we feel that we've understood his reasons for getting angry. Jackson pleads with his wife, trying to explain the ugly logic of his day. Staunton believes him, but doesn't care: "This is the kind of thing that always happens to you. You just won't let anything go. And I'm tired of it."

Pollack's speech regards the charity around which Affleck's missing file revolves. Affleck was in charge of making sure the elderly billionaire who owned the foundation signed a Power of Appointment before he died, because, he was told, his law firm would be more equipped to handle its management than a board of trustees comprised of the old man's friends. Affleck thought he was doing the right thing at the time, but now wonders whether he conned a confused and dying person to sign something he didn't understand. And he discovers that his bosses got several million dollars from the transfer of power. And yet maybe the deal was beneficial for the charity. And, of course, there's also... well, Pollack says things that are from a simple perspective, albeit one that we're not expecting to come up, and he cynically, perhaps dishonestly, tumbles down the whole house of cards that is Affleck's dilemma.

"Changing Lanes" is constantly pulling the rug from underneath us, seeing things from new sides, plunging deeper, getting more intense. In a running time of less than one hundred minutes, it gets profound without ever confusing us, it includes grand dramatic gestures and moments of tiny detail, and it does so with intelligent dialogue, fast-paced set pieces, careful use of star power and photography that combines flashiness with style and communicative skill. It is one of those rare movies where everything clicks into place exactly right, keeps building and does not falter.

COPYRIGHT© 2002 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2002 Reviews (alphabetical)
2002 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page