[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 
 

  
Cold Mountain

**

Cinema Review - December 2003

Rated on a 4-star scale. Certificate 15. USA. 152 minutes. Written and directed by Anthony Minghella; based on the novel by Charles Frazier. Produced by Albert Berger, William Horberg, Sydney Pollack, Ron Yerxa. Starring Jude Law, Nicole Kidman, Renée Zellweger, Donald Sutherland, Ray Winstone, Brendan Gleeson, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Natalie Portman, Kathy Baker, James Gammon, Giovanni Ribisi, Eileen Atkins, Charlie Hunnam, Jena Malone, Ethan Suplee, Jack White, Lucas Black, Jay Tavare, Melora Walters, Taryn Manning.


Here is a movie of letters withering in slow-burning flames, snow falling down on 17th Century ranches, long hair defiantly dancing amid the bitter breeze. A movie of big dramatic pauses before firmly romantic lines, of gazes into the distance, of heroes and villains who drip with a historical type of grit, and of landscapes, and landscapes, and landscapes.

Don't get me wrong. "Cold Mountain" is not just empty Oscar bait; I don't really think it was made with cynicism and egomania, and I've seen movies that strain harder and phonier to suck out tears or seem grand impressive. But we're on the right lines here. Whatever story Anthony Minghella was trying to tell when he agreed to adapt the Charles Frazier book, it's long gone out of focus. I get the feeling Minghella was so confident after "The English Patient" and "Talented Mr. Ripley", and the crew was so happy to go along with his confidence, and the studio was so basking in the Oscar buzz that's been around this project from the start, that they rested on the screenplay blindly and sat around in awe of the beauty they were capturing. This movie isn't about anything except its own literary preciousness -- we don't care about the characters, there isn't much sweep to speak of and all that's left are landscapes, sweet landscapes.

Oh, maybe the movie thinks it's about an actual story. Nicole Kidman is there in poverty in the middle of the Civil War, tending the North Carolina farm left by her late daddy. Jude Law is wandering back from the army to see her; he deserted, and now has to get away from lawmen while meetin' a whole buncha folks, some kindly, some kooky, some normal, some mean. She's going through the last act of "Gone With the Wind", he's having a random cross-country journey that we smart cultural types are always obliged to call a reference to "The Odyssey". In cutting between their stories, "Cold Mountain" tells of wartime suffering, and how the bond of love keeps hope alive, even though the lovers are apart.

It should have worked. It doesn't, because the rhythm is way off. Whether we're watching the domestic struggles of Kidman or Law doing moody wandering, scenes run on randomly, and don't build into a structure with arc or emphasis. They're also performed woodenly -- I was moved in "The English Patient" when Ralph Fiennes played Almasy as brooding with depression and longing; I am not moved by Nicole Kidman tensing her face and losing all traces of smile for the sake of Drama.

Kidman is joined by Renee Zellweger, who does some sort of godawful rootin', tootin' Calamity Jane routine. She stomps around the ranch, screeches in a more exaggerated Southern accent than any actress from the South could possibly have an excuse for, and gets to say, "I cried one tear for ma daddy, I stole it offa crocodile!" There's another awful accent from Ray Winstone, who starts his sentences kinda normal, drifts into Cockney, catches himself doing it and jerks into an over-the-top hick sheriff voice before grunting to a halt. The whole movie is filled with big-name character actors: Donald Sutherland, Natalie Portman, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Giovanni Ribisi. Even Jack White has a supporting role; that'll draw the teen crowd. "Cold Mountain" becomes a spot-the-personality game; every time one of these people pop up, they're distracting, and we reflect on how much fun Minghella must be having with his train set.

Maybe the actors explain how this thing cost over $100m and became the most expensive movie ever sole-financed by Miramax. As much as it wants to come across as full of aura and visual poetry, the look of it isn't that rich. It's not the colour or the camera movement or the depth of composition that makes it look good, it's the natural beauty of America. Or Romania, or wherever it was filmed. Lanscapes, landscapes…

COPYRIGHT© 2003 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2003 Reviews (alphabetical)
2003 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page