[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 

  
Dinosaur

*

Rated on a 4-star scale
Screening venue: Odeon (Liverpool City Centre)
Released in the UK by Buena Vista International on October 13, 2000; certificate PG; 84 minutes; country of origin USA; aspect ratio 1.85:1

Directed by Eric Leighton, Ralph Zondag; produced by Pam Marsden.
Written by John Harrison, Ralph Nelson Jacobs; from an original screenplay by Walon Green.
Edited by Lee H. Peterson.

CAST.....
Voice of D.B. Sweeney..... Aladar
Voice of Ossie Davis..... Yar
Voice of Max Cansella..... Zini
Voice of Alfre Woodard..... Plio
Voice of Hayden Panettiere..... Suri
Voice of Joan Plowright..... Baylene


"Dinosaur" should be used as a test for people trying to quit smoking. If you can survive it without a break for nicotine, you can get through anything. For each of its grotesque 84 minutes I stared at the screen depressed and appalled, realising I was watching something historic -- the moment when feature-length Disney animation became a dinosaur itself, losing the last shreds of its visual imagination and wit.

The company has been moving this way for years, with movies like "Pocahontas" and "Mulan" -- good projects, but without the sense of fun and commanding storytelling that has distinguished Disney for more than half a century. "Dinosaur" is stone-faced, nonsensical, technically incompetent trash, whose few moments of humour fall flat on their faces. I don't get what it's going for -- its implausible plot shies away from history to pander to the kiddies, and yet it's so slow and lifeless that it feels like it's trying to be educational.

The film opens with a community of monkeys on an island finding a dinosaur egg. (Monkeys were not around until thousands of years after dinosaurs.) They choose to raise the young dinosaur as one of their own. (Impossible.) When some young monkeys express fear of the thing, their mother advises "We'll teach him to hate eating meat." (Uh, huh.)

As a baby, the dinosaur, named Aladar, says "Googoo, gaga!" and makes general human baby sounds, but that's nothing -- when he grows up, he and the monkeys have heart-to-hearts, discuss chat-up lines and crack jokes in sophisticated constructions that require an English vocabulary. Later in the film, different species of dinosaurs, some of them carnivorous, some herbivorous, all roam around in the same herd together, and they too are able to interact. I'm prepared to accept that animals can talk in the movies. This is pushing it.

Meteorites hit the Earth early on in the picture, destroying most of the monkey characters, so the four survivors, along with Aladar, join a march of dinosaurs who have also suffered an attack from the skies and are roaming across the land in search of a new home. Aladar stays at the back of the line with annoying elderly members of the party who keep lagging behind and holding up everyone else. We're supposed to boo and hiss at the leader of the procession, who says that if they can't keep up with the pace, that's tough luck... but isn't he just being practical? Movies used to portray toughness as a virtue. Think of "The Great Escape". Now, it seems, you get to be a cinematic hero if you're a sissy whining on behalf of two or three invalids in a manner that risks hundreds of lives.

I digress. The above is not the most bugging element of this movie; that would be the fact that the majority of the narrative is grim, endless trekking across barren rock, by creatures who all look the same from a distance. Much has been made in the press of the spectacular animation, but I would seriously question the eyesight of anyone impressed by these visuals. There are great elements -- in the early scenes, background items such as grass and water are stunningly realised. But the animals seem fake; they're seen in some sort of weird hypercolour cross between cartoon and photography -- not looking real, nor like regular animation, they appear to have been plucked from a Playstation game. Eyes are crucial in creating the illusion of life; those in "Dinosaur" look like glow-in-the-dark marbles that have been attacked with a florescent pen.

Who will enjoy this movie? It doesn't look good, nothing happens, the only comedy is a few bad wisecracks in jive accents, and it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Near the end I started chanting to myself "Please comet fall, please movie end", but we're deprived of seeing the dinosaurs get wiped out, and instead there's a voice-over summation where one of the them wonders where their journey will end up. Sorry, dude, but you're gonna get blown to smithereens. What a gyp.

COPYRIGHT© 2000 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2000 Reviews (alphabetical)
2000 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page