[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 
 
Elephant

  
Elephant

***1/2

Cinema Review - February 23, 2004

Rated on a 4-star scale. Certificate 15. USA. 81 minutes. Written and directed by Gus Van Sant. Produced by Dany Wolf. Starring Alex Frost, Eric Deulen, John Robinson, Elias McConnell, Jordan Taylor, Carrie Finklea, Nicole George, Brittany Mountain, Alicia Miles, Kristen Hicks, Bennie Dixon.


I have my own theories about why Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold went into Columbine High School four years ago with an arsenal of guns and home-made bombs, killing thirteen students. I think it's described pretty simply. They were sick of being bullied, depressed as most teenagers are, not able to see a way out. Combine their need to lash out with the fact they had access to guns, and hey, you've got a massacre.

"I can resist anything except temptation," said Oscar Wilde, which sort of relates here because violent fantasies are one thing and knowing you can carry them out is another. We all have days where, jeez, we could just kill someone. We don't, because we're not crazy, and even a lot of unbalanced people avoid becoming violent because they don't have easy access to weapons. If they did, who knows what could happen -- it only takes one time to make the wrong decision and for things to be changed forever. Without getting into debates about how America needs to go about gun control, the tragedy in Littleton is one occasion where being able to get hands on weapons made all the difference to a lot of people's lives.

The strange thing about Gus Van Sant's "Elephant" is that it doesn't deal with such issues. Politics is not its business, or theory its intent. That is for another movie -- not a better one, or a worse one, just a different one. Van Sant does everything he can to strip away subjectivity, and just observe, record. Is that possible? In the movies, isn't every choice of costume, casting and framing loaded with unconscious judgement? Well, yes. Usually. But somehow Van Sant gets rid of it.

He follows a kid called Elias, who confidently takes photos of people in the park and develops them in the school dark room. And John, who wanders around aimlessly, one of those guys who gets away with pale skin and slouching because he makes it look like a sexy alternative rock pose. There is a trio of girls who talk about, like, boys, and, like, makeup, and like, how totally fattening their lunch is. We get glimpses of Bennie, a tall tough guy, and Kristen, who works in the library.

They're just going about their day. In their costumes and some of their actions, they fit into personality types, but I never got the feeling that they were dressed up to be loaded with commentary -- Van Sant has cast real high-schoolers, whose characters are often named after the actors, and who presumably dress like they do in real life. Elias takes his snaps, John gets to school late and receives a detention, Kristen walks around with the book cart. There are a few shots that seem silly: The film makes a point of following the twitty girls into the bathroom, where the camera stays outside the stalls and we can hear them puking in unison. And the social outcasts, Alex and Eric, are seen leering at violent video games with daydreamy fascination.

On the whole, though, it's pretty normal stuff. The camera style makes it interesting and original while working to drain the filmmaking of pointedness or suggestion: When the characters are walking, it floats with them from behind, in exact correlation with their movements. When they sit and talk, it drifts past their faces in a straight line, creating in us a dreamy fascination, and on its own part refusing to create deliberate compositions and make a cinematic point about the images it captures.

It is plain. Banal. Ordinary. Until it just isn't, and the guns come in. "Elephant" doesn't want to make us feel the frustration of high school life that leads people to go mad with automatic weapons. It regards things with detachment. It steps back and sees the massacre in such real, unadorned terms, that it makes the violence seem completely without the release that the killers thought it would have. We're shocked when we see people get shot, because it's such a random and unnecessary blast of evil. At the end of it all, there's a numbness. Why did they bother? What did it serve? Art holds a mirror up to life, and when you hold a mirror up to high school killers, they look alone and bumbling and pathetic, blasting away while the ordinary rhythms of the air stay as ordinary and blank as ever.

COPYRIGHT© 2004 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2004 Reviews (alphabetical)
2004 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page