[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 

 
Cinema Releases - February 16, 2001

The Emperor's New Groove

***

Certificate U. 78 minutes. Directed by Mark Dindal. Written by David Reynolds, from a story by Roger Allers, Mark Dindal, Matthew Jacobs, Chris Williams. With the voices of David Spade, John Goodman, Eartha Kitt, Patrick Warburton.

 

Hannibal

*1/2

Certificate 18. 132 minutes. Directed by Ridley Scott. Written by David Mamet, Steven Zaillian; based on the novel by Thomas Harris. Starring Anthony Hopkins, Julianne Moore, Gary Oldman, Giancarlo Giannini, Ray Liotta, Frankie R. Faison.


"Hannibal" announces fairly early on that it isn't going to be a worthy sequel to "The Silence of the Lambs", proceeds as acceptable fluff, then plunges as low as possible to turn into an unwholesomely smarmy geek show. It's so glad to have cultural icon Hannibal Lecter as its main character that it just has to become a circus act and show us all its gross-out tricks.

Quick recap, for the record: "The Silence of the Lambs" (1991), adapted from Thomas Harris's bestseller, was the chilling story of FBI agent Clarice Starling tracking down a serial killer called Buffalo Bill with the help of brilliant but demented psychiatrist Hannibal 'The Cannibal' Lecter, imprisoned in a mental hospital for killing and eating his patients. Around wonderfully crafted horror and thriller plots, the agent and the cannibal formed in their exchanges an eerily subtle bond through mutual respect and shared wounds; Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins both won Oscars for their performances, and the film itself was winner for Best Picture, a cultural phenomenon, and one of the great movies of the last decade.

Harris published the follow-up "Hannibal" in 1999 to much acclaim, and a movie deal was made straight away, something of an indicator that it was simply a cash-in attempt. This was confirmed by the fact that filming went ahead when Foster turned down the opportunity to reprise her role, and Julianne Moore ("Short Cuts", Boogie Nights") stepped into her shoes.

The story: Clarice presides over a botched drug raid, is made a scapegoat and put on suspension. The case makes the news, and her "old pal" Hannibal, who escaped custody at the end of "Silence", starts a correspondence with her, saying they'd "have a lot of fun" if she were to track him down. He's on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list, knows that if any information about him were to surface it would provoke interest, and also knows that Clarice would be reinstated to handle the case, as she has more experience with it than anyone else. Hannibal sees himself as doing Clarice a favour; he also just enjoys playing games.

So the main thrust of the film is essentially Clarice trying to trace Hannibal's whereabouts -- Venice, as it turns out, and there is a parallel plot to show what a dangerous business the Lecter case is, involving an Italian cop who has discovered Hannibal's identity and is trying to find a way to capture him for reward.

"Hannibal" can at no point be taken seriously as a sequel to "Silence" because there are too many fundamental flaws. The very premise of Hannibal being able to roam the streets makes him a more standard villain than he was in the 1991 picture; we're not scared of him because of the psychological trauma he can inflict on people from his cell, or the terrifying images his vivid words can conjure, but because we never know when he might leap at someone's face and bite into it. The absence of Jodie Foster is also impossible to ignore; the screenplay constantly relies on references to the history between Hannibal and Clarice -- history we did not see Moore have, and cannot believe she had, because Foster made too much of an impression. Moore's presence draws attention to itself; it would have been an impossible task for her to make the role her own.

None of this bothered me too much during the first half of the film, which gleefully ignores thoughts of being good art and just wants to be slickly lurid entertainment. Ridley Scott, always a reliable studio craftsman, has turned out over an hour of solid, well-photographed, well-edited conventional thriller material -- with all the obligatory cop movie scenes, like the old flame within the department, interviews of witnesses, the scene where the hero turns in gun and badge, and, of course, cat-and-mouse games. This might not be magnificence, but it's more enjoyable than "The Art of War".

But I lost all sympathy for the movie in its latter passages, when it turned into a parade of nauseating atrocities. If this had been a serious film, or even one that revealed its intentions from the git-go, then its level of carnage might have been acceptable, but this is more or less a standard dumb crime picture that suddenly decides it wants to appal us and have a joke about it. It's not every movie where, in graphic detail, a chap cuts off his own face and feeds it to a dog, someone gets a lobotomy at the dinner table and carries on eating, or guys get thrown to man-eating hogs in a customised torture pit. Rarer still are movies that play this stuff for laughs -- none of it is shown in an obviously ironic way, but we do get the impression that the filmmakers don't seem to care about it much, and are simply laying it out to disgust us. The last scene embodies this to offensive degree; its structure, its scoring and the wink Hopkins plays it with all reveal that it's somehow supposed to be funny, when Hannibal feeds brain to a child.

.

Speaking of children's fare -- Disney needs to get its act together. Most of us remember with fondness the spectacular comeback it made in the early 1990s, with delightful, witty animated features like "Beauty and the Beast" (1991) and "Aladdin" (1992); perceptive viewers will also notice how dreadfully the company has been losing its sense of humour in the last few years, with stilted, overly serious efforts such as "Pocahontas" (1995) and last year's abysmal "Dinosaur".

"The Emperor's New Groove" is a step in the right direction, a silly but refreshing comedy about… um… an arrogant royal who gets turned into a llama. The mouthy llama emperor (voiced by David Spade) then has to reclaim his throne by travelling across the countryside with a fat peasant (John Goodman) and seizing his position back from a crazed witch (Eartha Kitt).

Yes, it's from way out of left field, and structurally it's a predictable buddy comedy and series of chases. But damn, it's so much more colourful than a lot of recent Disney fare, and its eccentricity is often amusing, what with the entertainingly bumbling villains, and random amusements like when the witch slips on a potion turning her into a cat that emits a piercing, cackling laugh while bumping around like a pinball.

The picture does have some big flaws. While Disney cartoons traditionally feature amusing side characters -- Aladdin's monkey, the Beast's domestic items, or the wonderful Eddie Murphy character in "Mulan" (1998) -- "Emperor's New Groove" pretty much sticks to its central foursome, and the absence of others is a shame. As well as that, the caustic egotism of the Spade character gets annoying real quick, as do some of the arguments he and Goodman have, because they seem to go on forever.

Never mind. Animated films don't need to be genius -- they just need to make sure they don't do too much wrong. "The Emperor's New Groove" might not have the heart or the wit of Disney films from a decade ago, or even of the recent DreamWorks effort "The Road to El Dorado", but hey, just compare it to "Dinosaur".

COPYRIGHT© 2001 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2001 Reviews (alphabetical)
2001 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page