[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 

  
Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

***

Cinema Releases - December 21, 2001

Rated on a 4-star scale. Certificate PG. 178 minutes. Directed by Peter Jackson. Written by Philippa Boyens, Peter Jackson, Frances Walsh; from the novel by J.R.R. Tolkien. Starring Elijah Wood, Ian McKellen, Viggo Mortensen, Sean Astin, Sean Bean, Ian Holm, Cate Blanchett, Liv Tyler.


I happen to be one of the few readers of the world unfamiliar with J.R.R. Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings" series. I tried and failed to read the books as a kid -- all that convoluted fantasy history and all those strange nouns put me off. I picked the books up again recently, and found that they were easier than I thought, but I still couldn't be bothered.

Uninformed of a classic literary work I may be, but at least I was able to approach "Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" without any baggage. Tolkien devotees will undoubtedly quibble over details, but I was new to this story of mythical dwarfs known as Hobbits trying to save Middle Earth from the enslaving power of a coveted ring, and free to judge it independently as a piece of cinema.

Peter Jackson's film has creatures terrifying and wondrous, massive battle scenes and settings that mix medieval fact with supernatural imagination. We've been hearing for almost two years about how New Line Cinema invested several hundred million dollars to undertake the shooting of three lavish "Lord of the Rings" movies, and Jackson has not let us down in terms of giving us an awesome visual spectacle.

The cinematography frames action toweringly and is lit with a magical glow. Special effects are the lifeblood of the film, and they're impeccable because they're invisible, with every epic fight, every monster, every otherworldly setting appearing convincingly and breathtakingly. Forget the words of a movie review -- just look at a still. We expected this movie to delight the senses, and it does; just because we predicted the fact doesn't mean we should underestimate how hard it was to pull off. "Fellowship of the Ring" deserves all the technical praise in the world.

And yet it is far from being a masterpiece -- unlike movies with similar structures such as "Star Wars" and "The Matrix", it lacks personality, and it's hard to really connect with the material. Characters like Luke Skyalker and Neo truly lived and breathed; they weren't written with overwhelming complexity, but they were brought to the screen with humanity and wit. The first third of "Fellowship" fails at drawing us in; instead of introducing the characters, it skims over them and appears stiff. After that, the masses of plot take over and we're caught up in following the story, but we'd have more incentive to do so if we were hooked on a gut level.

Of course, there's so much plot that it sweeps away our attention, and we can't help but get involved. "Fellowship of the Ring" could have been more striking, and at three hours it's more than a little tiring -- but it still offers captivating story and visuals. There is no doubt that it's worth seeing, and yes, I'm looking forward to the sequels.

COPYRIGHT© 2001 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2001 Reviews (alphabetical)
2001 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page