Stir of Echoes
***1/2
Rated on a 4-star
scale
Screening venue: Odeon (Liverpool City Centre)
Released in the UK by Fox on May 26, 2000; certificate 15; 99 minutes; country
of origin USA; aspect ratio 1.85:1
Directed by David Koepp; produced by Judy
Hofflund, Gavin Polone.
Written by David Koepp; based on the novel by Richard
Matheson.
Photographed by Fred Murphy; edited by Jill
Savitt.
CAST.....
Kevin Bacon..... Tom Witzky
Kathryn Erbe..... Maggie Witzky
Ileana Douglas..... Lisa
Liza Weil..... Debbie Kozac
Kevin Dunn..... Frank McCarthy
Conor O'Farrell..... Harry Damon
Jenny Morrison..... Samantha
Zachary David Cope..... Jake Witzky
"Stir of Echoes" is one of the year's
best films, is based on a best selling novel, and features Kevin Bacon in
one of his most skilful performances. Films of this calibre don't often hit
our screens. And yet it has arrived with little advance buzz and a cheap
publicity campaign. Why? Maybe because people are still eating up "The Sixth
Sense", the ghost story from last year that got six Oscar nominations and
topped box office charts. "Stir of Echoes" shames that silly con trick, matching
its spooky atmosphere in every frame, and going much further in developing
a story.
Bacon plays Tom Witzky, a blue-collar guy from
Chicago who one night jokingly dares his kooky sister-in-law Lisa (Ileana
Douglas) to hypnotise him. "How can you believe in all that superstitious
crap?" he asks. When Lisa has him under, she leaves him with what's known
as a Post-Hypnotic Suggestion, leaving a message in his brain. She asks him
to be more open-minded.
And that he becomes, but not in the way she intended.
After Tom wakes up he has disturbing visions and feelings of strange sickness,
because he's now a 'receiver' -- a person able to see everything around him,
both material and supernatural. His son Jake (Zachary David Cope) has always
had the gift, and tells his father "Don't be afraid of it, daddy." When Tom
calms down, and tries to make sense of the phenomena going on around him,
he realises he's being haunted by the ghost of a dead teenage girl who wants
him to unearth something related to her memory.
There are a lot of plot threads in "Stir of Echoes",
all of which somehow become related to this girl. But they don't feel like
story manoeuvres, they feel like atmosphere, because everything is set up
through either realistic supporting characters or Tom's visions. Things are
glimpsed just enough so we can mark and remember them, but not so much that
we can figure out what everything means or is leading up to. While we're
watching the movie, all we can focus on is the fact that Tom is going through
something weird, and I found myself shivering, jumping and glaring in disgusted
disbelief, as the haunting got more serious, tormenting and dominating Tom's
life. We see what he sees, and it gets under our skin by coming in violent
flashes, through bizarre angles, colours and speeds.
Disorientating apparitions alone cannot carry
a film. Here they are supported by a) cinematography whose dark, shady tones
walk the line between realistic and spooky, so we can never quite relax;
and b) a performance of intensity from Bacon. He's not always cast in sombre
roles, but he's perfect for them -- his good looks and sense of humour can
always win audiences over, and his strong features and hungry face mean that
when his character is taking something seriously, we do too. In "Stir of
Echoes" he plays a man whose head gets torn apart, and we're sure as hell
let know it.
It's also good to see a picture like this set
in a regular neighbourhood; usually in these movies only the affluent get
ghouls or spirits coming to visit. That's one example of the richness of
"Stir of Echoes", which is as detailed in texture as a novel, and doesn't
contain standard movie clichés like Tom taking a long time to realise
the obvious, or keeping his experiences secret from his wife. Consider also
the final shot, which is not just a cheap scare, but a remembrance of the
implications of the story. I haven't read the Richard Matheson source material,
and in fact perhaps I should stop reading books altogether. After all, most
of the literary adaptations I have enjoyed this year have been based on things
I haven't read. Then again, maybe this is just a wonderful
movie.
COPYRIGHT© 2000 Ian
Waldron-Mantgani
2000 Reviews
(alphabetical)
2000 Reviews (by star
rating)
Archive of all cinema reviews
(alphabetical)
Review Archive
Index
UK
Critic main page
|
![[Image]](http://www.ukcritic.com/posbanr2.gif)