[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 
 
  
A still from the making of "Ten"

  
Ten

**1/2

Cinema Releases - December 20, 2002

Rated on a 4-star scale. Certificate 12A. Iran. 92 minutes. Written and directed by Abbas Kiarostami. Starring Mania Akbari, Amin Maher, Roya Arabashi, Katayoun Taleidzadeh, Mandana Sharbaf, Amene Moradi, Kamran Adl, Morteza Tabatabaii, Bahman Kiarostami, Mastaneh Mohajer, Mazdak Sepanlu, Reza Yadzdani.


I look at reviews of Abbas Kiarostami's "Ten" with a mixture of puzzlement and suspicion. The film has things going for it, but there are also moments of absolute amateurism, and ultimately it is a curious failure. When the Guardian's Peter Bradshaw writes that it is, "brilliant, radically minimal", what he actually means is it's shot on camcorder and he has decided to ignore the fact that this is not something new. When he says that it gives us "a sense that you have witnessed something profoundly important", I cannot help but think that he would see the material as a lot more down to earth if it were not set in Iran.

There is a temptation to overrate films from countries of traditionalist regimes -- to pick up on every hint of their modernity, intelligence and savvy, and claim them to be revolutionary. Sure, it's nice to see a movie like "Ten", which pays attention to women while coming from a society where they have little voice. And yet isn't it somewhat patronising, perhaps even a subtle form of racism, to overestimate that? Movies like this are important, but significance is not the same thing as quality.

"Ten" is a collection of ten short scenes, shot on stationary video camera, showing either the passenger or driving seat of a car. In each story, it's the same vehicle, whose driver is a divorced mother played by Mania Akbari. The first sequence shows an argument with her pre-teen son Amin (Amin Maher), and this situation is revisited several times. In other segments, Akbari is shown talking to such people as her sister, an unidentified young woman, an old lady on her way to church and a prostitute who gets into the car by mistake.

Maybe it's a faux pas to ask fundamental logical questions of films as artsy as this, but I'm gonna plough ahead anyway, and the beret crowd can scoff all it wants. Who is Akbari? What is her character? Where does she work? She's not a cab driver, because we never see her accept any money or use appropriate lingo, and so why is she giving all these strangers lifts, and why are they so willing to jump in her door? The character makes reference to being a liberated woman who wants to indulge herself in the arts, and so it is possible she's on some journey of discovery in which she drives around with different types of folks for educational purposes. Perhaps, but we don't find out.

The scenes themselves are a mixed bag. Akbari and the sister basically have a girlie chat; I'm sure a lot could be read into it by those willing to do so, but hey -- talking about picking up stuff from the bakery, and rehashing family strife, is essentially a bit of shooting the breeze. The scene with the old woman follows something about her devotion to God that I found hard to follow. Confession time: I actually ended up drifting into a short nap at this point, so the lack of understanding is as much my fault as that of Kiarostami.

The sequence with the prostitute is embarrassing. The camera stays fixed on Akbari as the conversation progresses. The hooker cackles piercingly, in between speech where she contradicts herself with declarations that her job is all about sex, and not about sex at all, and she loves it, and she doesn't love it, and she's better than Akbari, and she can't stand the feeling that Akbari is looking down on her. Yeah, yeah -- the film is attempting to examine her tattered, unclear mindset and lack of comprehensive expression. I don't care. It doesn't work. Akbari's dialogue in this scene is essentially a rehash of old do-gooder clichés about the evils of prostitution, how it demeans women, and how the prostitute could do something with her life if she got some self-esteem. Good sentiments, badly and unselfconsciously expressed.

That is, of course, part of Akbari's character. It becomes annoying in that scene, fascinating in others. Look at the moments in which she argues with her son. The mother lectures the boy on how she is a brave person for divorcing her husband, and tells him that he should respect her for embracing her freedom. The boy shakes his head, dismisses her arguments, claims her to be selfish and refuses to accept the love of his stepfather. Some critics have read these moments as a strong female character attempting to reason with a kid who is on the road to male chauvinism, but I don't think it's that simple. Both characters have valid points. The mother should not have to live in a society where women are second-class citizens. The boy deserves better than a mother wrapped up in theoretical pretensions, and although he can neither quite express it properly or get his mother to listen, he is not entirely wrong that the job of a parent is to put your own needs behind those of your child. And yet, nobody is that perfect. Around and around the argument goes: The pity is that neither person is listening to the other. The touching thing is that they both want to love each other; a late scene in which both of them manage to smile at the same time is surprising in its impact.

Akbari's performance is one of commitment and interest; she talks and talks, and gives us a sense of a personality. Maher, the kid, is astonishing: He acts with naturalism and truth, not through being subtle, but in the way he whines, shouts, doesn't seem to be able to be heard. He looks odd and silly when cupping his face in his hands, fidgeting, waving his arms -- but that is how frustrated young boys do look when trying to express a point.

What does this all add up to? I'm not exactly sure. The day may come when I see "Ten" on television, latch onto its train of thought, and find that it all makes blinding sense. But that has not happened yet. The film is difficult to watch. In between its moments of brilliance are stretches of failure and long spots of boredom.

COPYRIGHT© 2002 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2002 Reviews (alphabetical)
2002 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page