[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 
 

  
The Transporter

**

Cinema Reviews - Week of January 17, 2003

Rated on a 4-star scale. Certificate 15. USA/France. 92 minutes. Directed Corey Yuen. Written by Luc Besson, Robert Mark Kamen. Starring Jason Statham, Qi Shu, Matt Schulze, Francois Berleand, Ric Young, Doug Rand, Didier Saint Melin, Laurent Desponds, Matthieu Albertini.


My homeboy Tony Murphy has a thing about Jason Statham. He thinks that the man is unjustly unrecognised as one of the worst screen actors alive. He once put together a collage of the guy's facial expressions, just to prove the point. Statham was trying to look tough, but in the best pictures he appeared confused and in the worst like he was straining for a dump. Tony had a point.

It's hard to recall Statham doing anything wrong in "Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels" or "Snatch", but in those films he was playing low-rent Cockney hoods, and that was appropriate for a Brit who looks like he could kick some ass. Then he appeared in "The One", as a meathead Los Angeles cop with such lines as, "With all due respect, sir, that's bullshit!" He frowned excessively and strived to put on looks of concentration and toughness, and he talked in one of those laughably gravely action-movie accents that sound like impressions of the guy who does voice-overs for scary trailers.

When I first saw clips for "The Transporter", I could not believe my eyes and ears. Here was poor Jason, in the leading role of a major action movie, performing pretty much how he did in "The One". Again with the embarrassingly retarded frowning and grimacing, and an accent that I think is supposed to be an attempt at hard-ass American but sometimes just lapses into unhidden British. This was going to be the gigglefest of the year.

Sure enough, for most of the time, "The Transporter" sees Statham attempt to act mean in ways that beg for a laughter track. But -- and I can sense Tony raising his eyebrow at me -- there are moments when we see the guy's promise. He carries himself properly. His body language is interesting. If he didn't try so hard, if he took it down a notch, if he used his own damn voice, he could be a credible star. I've seen him in interviews, where he seems like a good bloke, humbled and grateful that his career is taking off. My guess is that he's open to advice. He should take mine, and live up to his potential, before he becomes a joke.

The movie sees him play an ex-military strongman now living in a French villa, whose upkeep is paid for by his job as a courier and getaway driver for wealthy European criminals. Why these gangsters can't use their own cars, I have no idea. But Statham is good at what he does; he keeps himself free of attachments, tries not to say more than the necessary, and has a few rules he never breaks: 1) Never change the deal; 2) No names; 3) Never look in the package.

Any movie about rules will soon see them broken, and the plot kicks off when Statham goes ahead and opens one of his packages, because it's wriggling around in the boot of his car. Inside is a beautiful young woman (Qi Shu), who breaks Statham's shell, wins his heart, and convinces him to help her free a shipment of slaves that are being brought in from China by her evil industrialist father. All this mess, of course, is a shoestring for a whole bunch of action sequences, involving machine guns, big vehicles and speedy martial arts.

The film is trash, but it's about as watchable as it can be, given the fundamental flaws of the Statham performance, the lack of intentional humour, and the fact that this is a Luc Besson production. Besson used to make interesting stuff like "The Big Blue" and "Leon", but now he's involved in action pictures that are a curious balance between blockbuster slickness and straight-to-video cheese. They have tricky camerawork and expansive fight sequences, and they manage to get wide releases all over the world, yet their photography looks just a little too dark to have been properly exposed, and little things like their credits sequences tend to edge on the tacky side.

In "The Transporter", we do at least get two terrific set pieces. There's an extraordinary opening car chase, where Statham manages to dodge through traffic and exhilaratingly zip down tiny streets while being pursued by every cop car available. Later, he finds himself fighting a crew of bad guys in the middle of a crude oil spill, and the scene is ridiculous but nonetheless inventive for the way our hero uses the tricky liquid to his advantage while everyone else slips around. The rest of the action is reasonable claptrap that almost gets boring but not quite. I do like the way the movie uses kung-fu; unlike Jet Li's recent films, which ignore his talent and instead plug him into the middle of special effects, this one actually shows men using their bodies to fight.

And this is about all that's fit to print. "The Transporter" is a mostly forgettable bunch of silly stunts, which is how Besson likes it these days, because it seems to be making him money. As for Statham, he's being half-heartedly advertised as the new Bruce Willis, and nobody is going to buy it. When he's good, yes, he's seriously good. When he isn't... well, at least it's entertaining.

COPYRIGHT© 2003 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


2003 Reviews (alphabetical)
2003 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page