[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 

  
Virtual Sexuality

*

Rated on a 4-star scale
UK
Directed by Nick Hurran
Written by Nick Fisher
Based upon the book by Chloe Rayban

CAST.....
Laura Fraser..... Justine
Rupert Penry-Jones..... "Jake"
Luke De Lacey..... Chas
Kieran O'Brien..... Alex
Marcelle Duprey..... Fran
Natasha Bell..... "Hoover"


Nick Hurran's "Virtual Sexuality" is, in at least one respect, thought-provoking -- after seeing it, I couldn't stop wondering which part deserved the most hatred. When a film is crass and stupid, with dimensionless characters, shallow philosophies, bizarrely nonsensical plot developments and awful concepts on how to use special effects, there are just so many choices...

The movie opens with a direct address from Justine (Laura Fraser), a drop-dead gorgeous 17-year old girl who's desperate to lose her virginity. Ignoring the implausibility of this, it goes on to show how Justine sees no likely candidates for her deflowering, viewing her only two male friends as a degenerate and a nerd. When a blind date to another potential beau is cancelled, she finds herself killing time at a computer fair, and steps inside a virtual reality makeover booth.

Still upset about missing out on the date, Justine uses the technology to create her ideal man. Then, a gas explosion a few blocks away somehow causes the computers to go haywire, and gee-whiz -- Justine herself gets the body of her ideal man! I've seen hundreds of movies where unrelated explosions cause people to switch bodies, and believe me, it means that the filmmakers are out of ideas.

Things get even more complicated for Justine -- or, as a man, known as "Jake" (Rupert Penry-Jones) -- when she discovers that there's another version of herself out there still existing in her own body. This doesn't make sense, but the film uses the dilemma to stretch to feature length.

Once upon a time, I had ideas for movies that resembled "Virtual Sexuality". I was six years old, and still dismissed them quickly. To think that adults could create this drivel, and seriously pass it off as entertainment, is embarrassing. It's obviously aimed at people with attention deficiency disorders, proven by the way everything we need to remember is furiously flashed onscreen as computerised bullet-points -- in one scene, even the words "dry leaves" inspire this visual pandemonium.

The attention-deficient will also -- perhaps -- fail to notice how zombie-like and immature the characters are. They display pre-pubescent knowledge and experience of both sex and life, as do the writer and director, in how they paint their caricature players. The aforementioned degenerate, for example, is shown bragging about his fictional conquests, and we're expected to believe that a locker-room full of 17-year olds would take him seriously, and be amazed. The nerd wears thick glasses and a mackintosh, and has three computers. The town slut always wears the same high heels, the same makeup, the same tight dress, and always sticks her breasts out in the same way.

Despite the complete disconnection with reality, "Virtual Sexuality" still has the gall to include soppy moralising, when the mocked nerd turns into the film's nice guy, and spouts a bunch of clichés about looking beyond appearances. Shockingly, the film even forgets these simple lessons, to deliver a message of superficiality and conformity, based on cruel teenage standards of separatism based on beauty.

What's most offensive about the whole "Virtual Sexuality" experience is what its creators are telling interviewers. They compare their product to John Hughes's teen flicks, like "The Breakfast Club" and "Ferris Bueller's Day Off". Those great films, and even "Weird Science", which had a similarly fantastical premise to this trash, explored the ups and downs of adolescence with enthralling drama, humour and truth, whereas during "Virtual Sexuality", my friend and I turned to admiring the neon "no smoking" sign on the wall. When subjected to inane tomfoolery, the mind seeks any distraction.

COPYRIGHT© 1999 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


1999 Reviews (alphabetical)
1999 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page