[Image]

[home]   [current reviews]   [review archive]  [ukey say...]   [song of the week]  [retrospectives]
[links]   [frequently asked questions]   [e-mail]


 

  
Wild Wild West

*1/2

Rated on a 4-star scale
USA
Directed by Barry Sonnenfeld
Written by Brent Maddock, Jeffrey Price, Peter S. Seaman and S.S. Wilson
From a story by Jim Thomas and John Thomas
Based upon the TV show  "The Wild Wild West", created by Michael Garrison

CAST.....
Will Smith..... James T. West
Kevin Kline..... Artemus Gordon/President Ulysses S. Grant
Kenneth Branagh..... Dr. Arliss Loveless
Salma Hayek..... Rita Escobar
Ted Levine..... General McGrath
Frederique Van Der Wal..... Amazonia
Musetta Vander..... Munitia
M. Emmet Walsh..... Coleman


Cinema is the ultimate art form, because it can incorporate all the others. My imagination, intellect and emotion have been brought many spectacular places by film, and that's why I fell in love with the medium. That's also why films like "Wild Wild West" are so confounding. How can studios pour millions of dollars and masses of talent into that a project that inspires such apathy? And how can they release it on the 100th anniversary of Alfred Hitckcock's birth?

"Wild Wild West" is based on a TV show from the 1960s, which I can't remember, but am told is good. It had to be better than this. Set in the late 1800s, after the American Civil War, the movie follows the team of Jim West (Will Smith) and Artemus Gordon (Kevin Kline), federal agents hand-picked by President Ulysses S. Grant (Kline again) to find out who has been kidnapping the nation's top scientists. West, a man of action, and Gordon, a master of disguise and gadgets, soon discover that the culprit is Dr. Arliss Loveless. Played by Kenneth Branagh, this villain is a deranged member of the Confederate Army who has returned from the dead to break up the United States and kill the President with a giant mechanical spider. Hmm.

In a film beset by problems, the biggest with "Wild Wild West" is a lack of direction. It doesn't know what kind of film it wants to be, and isn't light-hearted or loose enough to be corny fun like "The Mummy", or clever enough to get genuine laughs. When it's obviously trying to be funny, the jokes are clumsy, dreary and embarrassing. The filmmakers should study "Maverick", Richard Donner's sexy 1994 Western, which had beautiful comedy and action.

The robots and contraptions, whether devised by Gordon or Lovelace, are almost always ugly and annoying. They fill many of the action scenes, to grating effect, and even the beautiful photography of Michael Ballhaus can't save these moments. Will Smith's race is also treated clumsily -- instead of ignoring the fact that the actor is black, which has worked fine in Westerns such as "Sommersby" and "Unforgiven" -- his character is black as well. This leads to awkward slavery references and jokes, and a back-story to the character that has no place in something intended as a trivial romp.

Smith, who has an obnoxiously arrogant public persona, is surprisingly charming, although he can't go far with the material provided. His chemistry with Kline is virtually non-existent too, since neither performer seems to know if he's the straight or the funny man. Kline's dual roles are pointless , and as President Grant, he looks like Terry Wogan and sounds like a robot. As for Kenneth Branagh, I have no idea what he was thinking -- when you've just done Shakespeare and Woody Allen, you should set your sights higher than a script like this.

What I will say for "Wild Wild West" is that it's a lot less ridiculous than the trailers suggest. If you could sit through last year's summer offerings, such as "Godzilla" and "Lost in Space", then this, by comparison, is almost fun. And it may have some cathartic effect -- having seen it, perhaps that bloody awful theme song will be exorcised from my head.

COPYRIGHT© 1999 Ian Waldron-Mantgani


1999 Reviews (alphabetical)
1999 Reviews (by star rating)

Archive of all cinema reviews (alphabetical)
Review Archive Index

UK Critic main page